Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Romney's personal, family connection to the abortion issue
#1
A young woman who was the sister of Mitt Romney's brother-in-law died from an illegal abortion in 1963. Her family asked for donations to Planned Parenthood in her memory, but they were also asked to keep this secret due to political implications for Romney, Sr.


http://www.salon.com/2011/08/08/mitt_rom...nn_keenan/

"The outlines of the story first became public when Romney — unprompted — brought it up in that 1994 debate with Kennedy, whom he was trying to unseat. At the time, Romney, who was making his first bid for office, was struggling to prove his pro-choice bona fides to liberal Massachusetts voters. In the debate, he insisted that he separated his personal beliefs — opposition to abortion — from his policy position that abortion “should be safe and legal in this country.” Accused by Kennedy of being “multiple-choice,” Romney angrily fired back:

“On the idea of ‘multiple-choice,’ I have to respond. I have my own beliefs, and those beliefs are very dear to me. One of them is that I do not impose my beliefs on other people. Many, many years ago, I had a dear, close family relative that was very close to me who passed away from an illegal abortion. It is since that time that my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter. And you will not see me wavering on that."



Mitt, we see you wavering. And it's too bad really because your original position was very respectable.
Reply
#2
All four top Republican candidates signed a pledge that was nearly identical to Mississippi's Prop 26, which went down to defeat in what is arguably the most red/Republican state in the U.S.
Reply
#3
I'm sorry he is wavering, but I am also sorry that we have a political climate where we feel free to use family tragedies against candidates. Yes, he's the one who brought it up first but it still seems wrong to me to cudgel him with it.
Reply
#4
$tevie wrote:
I'm sorry he is wavering, but I am also sorry that we have a political climate where we feel free to use family tragedies against candidates. Yes, he's the one who brought it up first but it still seems wrong to me to cudgel him with it.

I agree, I don't appreciate the glee that many will feel upon reading this....

Interesting that Romney's quote above is one of the best I've seen that addresses how one can personally be anti abortion while being pro choice.
Reply
#5
hal wrote:
[quote=$tevie]
I'm sorry he is wavering, but I am also sorry that we have a political climate where we feel free to use family tragedies against candidates. Yes, he's the one who brought it up first but it still seems wrong to me to cudgel him with it.

I agree, I don't appreciate the glee that many will feel upon reading this....

Interesting that Romney's quote above is one of the best I've seen that addresses how one can personally be anti abortion while being pro choice.
If you think this is glee you badly misunderstand.
Personal history on an issue as important as this is important.
This woman's very real story is a poignant reminder of why we don't need to go back to the 1960's, as the anti-choice folks would like.
Reply
#6
I wouldn't imagine there is a lot of glee in reaction to this story.
Reply
#7
Grace, I said, "I don't appreciate the glee that many will feel upon reading this." I didn't accuse anyone who posted before me...

Grace62 wrote:
[quote=hal]
[quote=$tevie]
I'm sorry he is wavering, but I am also sorry that we have a political climate where we feel free to use family tragedies against candidates. Yes, he's the one who brought it up first but it still seems wrong to me to cudgel him with it.

I agree, I don't appreciate the glee that many will feel upon reading this....

Interesting that Romney's quote above is one of the best I've seen that addresses how one can personally be anti abortion while being pro choice.
If you think this is glee you badly misunderstand.
Personal history on an issue as important as this is important.
This woman's very real story is a poignant reminder of why we don't need to go back to the 1960's, as the anti-choice folks would like.
Reply
#8
hal wrote:
Grace, I said, "I don't appreciate the glee that many will feel upon reading this." I didn't accuse anyone who posted before me...

I think you're wrong to assume that anyone would experience glee upon readying this. Much less "many." I wasn't taking it personally.
Reply
#9
There WILL be people saying, "Hahahahah - whatta DWEEB!!! - just another ahole republican!!!"

with GLEE

I see it every day. Many don't care as long as their guy comes out on top...
Reply
#10
I do think that this kind of thing becomes grist for the "Gotcha" mill, and I also think that "glee" is an appropriate term for what a lot of people will feel. That doesn't mean I'm accusing anybody here, it's just the reality of politics today.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)