01-04-2006, 10:59 PM
I just finished a batch of my ass-ripping woodstove chili and was curious how you prefer yours, beans or no beans. Me, I'm a beaner with jack cheese, raw onions and a dark brew on the side.
Chili... Beans or No Beans
|
01-04-2006, 10:59 PM
I just finished a batch of my ass-ripping woodstove chili and was curious how you prefer yours, beans or no beans. Me, I'm a beaner with jack cheese, raw onions and a dark brew on the side.
01-04-2006, 11:02 PM
Chili with no beans = sloppy joes (just add buns).
01-04-2006, 11:10 PM
For hot dog topping, no beans. For just eatin', beans with a little mustard or a little shredded cheddar. I actually don't eat chili very much, but it is tasty.
![]() Whippet, Whippet Good
01-04-2006, 11:10 PM
Beans. No contest.
And lately no carne.
01-04-2006, 11:10 PM
No beans if it's canned but I put beans in my homemade chili. I tried not to use beans, but it's better with them.
01-04-2006, 11:20 PM
Beans and Frank's red hot sauce.
01-04-2006, 11:34 PM
beans for some protein and the nice side-effect. . .
_____________________________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
01-04-2006, 11:44 PM
You could always make Cincinnati chili and decide whether to have a four-way or five-way when you serve it.
01-04-2006, 11:46 PM
Use beans - they are healthy for you. Or, actually, legumes.
Skyline SUX
01-04-2006, 11:47 PM
rgG Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > For hot dog topping, no beans. I always used to smoosh the beans so they wouldn't be 'whole', more of a bean paste. "Gaggers and coffee milk" - what state am I from ? Grated cheese on my chile, please. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|