Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Chili... Beans or No Beans
#1
I just finished a batch of my ass-ripping woodstove chili and was curious how you prefer yours, beans or no beans. Me, I'm a beaner with jack cheese, raw onions and a dark brew on the side.
Reply
#2
Chili with no beans = sloppy joes (just add buns).
Reply
#3
For hot dog topping, no beans. For just eatin', beans with a little mustard or a little shredded cheddar. I actually don't eat chili very much, but it is tasty.
[Image: IMG-2569.jpg]
Whippet, Whippet Good
Reply
#4
Beans. No contest.

And lately no carne.
Reply
#5
No beans if it's canned but I put beans in my homemade chili. I tried not to use beans, but it's better with them.
Reply
#6
Beans and Frank's red hot sauce.
Reply
#7
beans for some protein and the nice side-effect. . .
_____________________________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Reply
#8
You could always make Cincinnati chili and decide whether to have a four-way or five-way when you serve it.
Reply
#9
Use beans - they are healthy for you. Or, actually, legumes.

Skyline SUX
Reply
#10
rgG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For hot dog topping, no beans.



I always used to smoosh the beans so they wouldn't be 'whole', more of a bean paste.

"Gaggers and coffee milk" - what state am I from ?


Grated cheese on my chile, please.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)