Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Oh, Hello There, Angry Trump Fan in the Comments!"
#1
Hello! It’s good to see you again, Irate Trump Fan yelling at the “sheeple” in the comments of your ex-coworker’s or second cousin’s post about how they actually like Hillary Clinton. You sure are showing everyone…something! I created this post because everyone is exhausted by your bullshit and no one has the time to write out long responses to your regurgitations from Breitbart and InfoWars, and if they did that would only mean talking to you more and that sounds awful. So, here are some answers to the garbage storm shooting out of your typing fingers.
http://alexanderckane.tumblr.com/post/15...e-comments
Reply
#2
$tevie that was not really interesting, it was more like "you just shut up and wait to loose." Fact check by building straw men is not convincing. Why make excuses for her genuine bad behaviors? Does this not make you uncomfortable when you really think about it?
Reply
#3
Good read.

Thanks!
Reply
#4
DevoBill wrote:
$tevie that was not really interesting, it was more like "you just shut up and wait to loose." Fact check by building straw men is not convincing. Why make excuses for her genuine bad behaviors? Does this not make you uncomfortable when you really think about it?

I would say her "bad behaviors" are somewhat analogous to Bridgegate. I don't believe anyone was seriously harmed when Gov. Christie and his staff did their petty revenge thing. (I've heard that people couldn't get emergency services due to traffic jams but I have not heard that their was any lasting harm to the affected people.). Same goes for Sec. Clinton's emails. Setting up the server was dumb and a mistake. Sec. Clinton has said as much. But really, no harm, no foul, at least according to the Director of the FBI, a Republican. Her other "bad behaviors" have been debunked although pay-for-play does smell a bit even if only good came of it.

One difference between the two is that in Bridgegate, Gov. Christie's staff set out to do harm using their official capacity. Sec. Clinton's server was not set up for the purpose of doing harm. That is why the governor's staff is facing hard time.
Reply
#5
Trump was just ushered off the stage by secret service in Vegas. Nothing happened.
Reply
#6
samintx wrote:
Trump was just ushered off the stage by secret service in Vegas. Nothing happened.

It was Chris Christie trying to climb onto the platform.
Reply
#7
samintx wrote:
Trump was just ushered off the stage by secret service in Vegas. Nothing happened.

The first thing I thought was that it was staged. I've gotten so I don't believe anything that happens around Trump.
Reply
#8
DevoBill wrote:
$tevie that was not really interesting, it was more like "you just shut up and wait to loose." Fact check by building straw men is not convincing. Why make excuses for her genuine bad behaviors? Does this not make you uncomfortable when you really think about it?

http://www.forwardprogressives.com/debun...spiracies/
http://www.scarymommy.com/hillary-clinto...-debunked/
http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/10...out/206289
https://medium.com/@hodgesmr/debunking-c....s0eyaikez
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hillary...s-debunked
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/opinio...onest.html
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/20...llary.html
http://www.dailynewsbin.com/opinion/fiel...als/24710/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-burnet...52080.html
Reply
#9
Speedy wrote:
[quote=DevoBill]
$tevie that was not really interesting, it was more like "you just shut up and wait to loose." Fact check by building straw men is not convincing. Why make excuses for her genuine bad behaviors? Does this not make you uncomfortable when you really think about it?

I would say her "bad behaviors" are somewhat analogous to Bridgegate..
Sure, point to "Bridgegate", avoid the really acute examples of Clinton's "bad behavior" where hundreds of thousands have died directly because of her actions. Like Syria and Libya.....
In 2012, Clinton was the obstacle, not the solution, to a ceasefire being negotiated by UN Special Envoy Kofi Annan. It was US intransigence - Clinton’s intransigence - that led to the failure of Annan’s peace efforts in the spring of 2012, a point well known among diplomats. Despite Clinton’s insinuation in the Milwaukee debate, there was (of course) no 2012 ceasefire, only escalating carnage. Clinton bears heavy responsibility for that carnage, which has by now displaced more than 10 million Syrians and left more than 250,000 dead.
It is almost 500,000 dead now.
That is the blood on her hands....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sa...31190.html

Reply
#10
I agree about Syria. But Trump lobbing nukes over there isn't going to do us any good. The pros and cons of the two candidates still leads back to Clinton.

I am proud of you for posting an article instead of an animated gif. Our little boy is growing up.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)