Posts: 21,860
Threads: 1,734
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
I've looked at a few Amtrak routes and they always take an incredibly long time. I took a train in Europe this summer, and by comparison the trip was quicker than we could do in a car. That said, the train did do about 200kmh for a while, so I know that helped.
One train in the US I'm looking at takes 27 hours. It's about 900 miles. That means it averages about 33mph. I've read "More than half of Amtrak trains operate at top speeds of 100 mph". Still, that means they spend most of their time stopped or going extra slow.
Posts: 37,099
Threads: 2,599
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Trains are socialism
er i mean politics.
Posts: 4,698
Threads: 36
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
My understanding is that our tracks are not in the same condition as theirs, and cannot support such high speeds - apart from the DC to Boston line.
Posts: 68,324
Threads: 17,210
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
1
....even in dreams......when trains are going through tunnels....over.....and over.....and over again........very slow.....what would Freud say.......??
_____________________________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Posts: 15,842
Threads: 95
Joined: May 2025
Why?, because the infrastructure for passenger rail in this country was largely let go during the '50's and '60's in favor of travel by car or plane. Except in a few dedicated corridors the passenger trains are going over the same tracks as freight trains. Maintenance on those tracks is done to freight standards, not conducive to high speed passenger travel. There are more issues, but basically in the US the rail infrastructure is in no way comparable to that in Europe where passenger travel is concerned
Posts: 10,594
Threads: 664
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
The biggest issue is that a lot of the rail that Amtrak runs on is owned by the freight tail lines. So, their trains have the right of way.
Posts: 48,066
Threads: 9,823
Joined: Dec 2021
Reputation:
0
I live in Princeton Junction and I am surprised how many high speed trains go by at high speed. They do not stop here, I assume they are Acela trains traveling from DC to Boston. During weekends when I take the train to NY or when I go hiking in a park I see then every 10-15 min. I didn’t expect to see so many.
Posts: 24,633
Threads: 1,093
Joined: May 2025
Passenger rail service is an afterthought in this country. They make money by shipping cargo, and maintain passenger service as a loss-leading "lip service" to keep their subsidies coming in.
Except for a few corridors, no one wants to spend 3x longer on a train, when they could take a plane, or drive. In the Western U.S. especially, there is ZERO advantage to a train vs flying or driving.
Posts: 31,028
Threads: 2,688
Joined: May 2025
At 300 miles or under, rail travel is preferable. At 300-600 miles, it is comparable to flying. It is not desirable at over 600 miles. This is a generalization, of course, depending on locality, but is generally true, so it depends on where you live and the proximity of other cities and train infrastructure.
