Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What's your opinion about possible Constitutional amendments?
#1
I'd like to keep discussion (if there is any) of amendments to amendments that have only one central concept or a few very closely related yet somewhat distinct issues related to a central concept.

If a magic fairy said that they would grant you three Constitutional amendments that would magically be ratified, what three Constitutional amendments would you wish for?

My mind sort of boggles at the prospect. I'd like to fix the huge disparity in populations represented in the Senate - it's just too unfair the way it is. And perhaps in the same amendment get fair representation in the federal government for Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico if they choose statehood.

I'd like to make it clear that no one can legally discriminate against another citizen based solely on some characteristic they have that they none to very little choice in having (and, no, religious "freedom" would not be a legal justification for such discrimination).

I'd like to do away with the Electoral College and implement ranked choice voting. In the same amendment I would unequivocally state that voting is a right.

I'd like to make Supreme Court terms limited to about 16 years.

I'd like to see the President be required to disclose his financial interests and for the duration of his term, put his business dealings into a truly blind trust. And on a closely related issue, the amendment would also say, "F**k Trump".

There so many things. I imagine you all can conjure up a whole lot more worthwhile amendments.


Are there any potential Constitutional amendments that you think might plausibly actually be ratified?

It seems doubtful to me given the current political climate. I can't think of anything that "both sides" (us and them) can agree on enough to jump the high hurdle for passing an amendment.
Reply
#2
How about an amendment that would require a polygraph test for anyone running for office? And no. I'm not kidding. The questions asked may have to be approved by some committee.
Reply
#3
DC and PR statehood still tops my list.

I would add a true voting rights amendment - need to end Jim Crow and related voter suppression once and for all. Maybe end infinite $$ in politics while we are at it.

Once we have empowered everyone in the country to have a true vote, we can start dealing with other issues you list, many that do not need to amend the Constitution.

I think the EC can be functionally eliminated without an amendment, for example.

Same with disclosure documents for Presidential candidates.
Reply
#4
sekker wrote:
DC and PR statehood still tops my list.

I would add a true voting rights amendment - need to end Jim Crow and related voter suppression once and for all. Maybe end infinite $$ in politics while we are at it.

Once we have empowered everyone in the country to have a true vote, we can start dealing with other issues you list, many that do not need to amend the Constitution.

I think the EC can be functionally eliminated without an amendment, for example.

Same with disclosure documents for Presidential candidates.

I'm with you on ending Jim Crow and crafting some language that makes it a Constitutional requirement to disclose financial interactions with elected officials (that's going to be tough to write).


About the Electoral College:

Article II, Section 1, Clauses 2 and 3 of the Constitution state:

"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress; but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States shall be appointed an Elector.

The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States."

Seems like it would require an amendment to delete this part of the Constitution.

The issue of requiring financial disclosure might be done by just passing a law, but it seems to be an open question:

https://abovethelaw.com/2019/12/can-a-st...uirements/
Reply
#5
polygraph

Junk science, inadmissible in court, and able to be beaten by sociopaths (like politicians).
Reply
#6
About 25 years ago or so, there was a moderate Republican congressman who represented Long Beach, CA and thereabouts, and I remember him saying that the effective way to get control of campaign financing was for congress to pass a Constitutional amendment that the states would have to ratify, that would give congress the power to set the money limits in federal elections. We've had laws which did things along those lines until the Supreme Court shot them down, but a 28th Amendment could do the job if passed. I'm not sure I want it, but it might be a possibility.
Reply
#7
ERA
Reply
#8
Campaign financing reform, including doing away with corporate money

Voting - no electoral college, uniform rules in all states, non-partisan congressional districting

rework the second amendment, not to eliminate but to regulate
Reply
#9
Get rid of the Electoral College for sure.

Modified Term Limits: 2 CONSECUTIVE terms for Senate, 4 CONSECUTIVE terms for the House. Even for "safe" seats, the break would benefit both the incumbent and his replacement, let them compete for the job again!
Reply
#10
Ombligo wrote:
Campaign financing reform, including doing away with corporate money

Additionally and kind of related, get the f___ rid of Citizens United.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)