Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Oh thank goodness. Mark McCloskey got a new AR.
#1
Since the judge confiscated his other one. For pointing it at protesters.

But that was only a misdemeanor, so off to the gun store!



https://twitter.com/shannonrwatts/status...06278?s=19
Reply
#2
Also, he seems to be sporting an orange look.
Reply
#3
Sorry I didn't see this was being discussed below. His purchase is perfectly legal, his misdemeanor gun conviction doesn't prevent him from purchasing a new one.
Reply
#4
mattkime wrote:
Also, he seems to be sporting an orange look.
Yeah, that shyster is trying to look 20 years younger. I wonder how much 'work' his co-conspirator is getting too ? If she was the lady in the next photo, yikes, she's had a buncha work done too.

His neighbors HATE him. He's a lawsuit happy SOB.
Reply
#5
Lemon Drop wrote:
Sorry I didn't see this was being discussed below. His purchase is perfectly legal, his misdemeanor gun conviction doesn't prevent him from purchasing a new one.

Part of his worthless plea deal was to hand over the other gun. Why, I don’t know, because of course he’d just get a replacement and crow about it. He’d also told the judge he proudly threatened the protestors.
Reply
#6
deckeda wrote:
[quote=Lemon Drop]
Sorry I didn't see this was being discussed below. His purchase is perfectly legal, his misdemeanor gun conviction doesn't prevent him from purchasing a new one.

Part of his worthless plea deal was to hand over the other gun. Why, I don’t know, because of course he’d just get a replacement and crow about it. He’d also told the judge he proudly threatened the protestors.
Things make little sense in 2A white America.
Reply
#7
Lemon Drop wrote:
[quote=deckeda]
[quote=Lemon Drop]
Sorry I didn't see this was being discussed below. His purchase is perfectly legal, his misdemeanor gun conviction doesn't prevent him from purchasing a new one.

Part of his worthless plea deal was to hand over the other gun. Why, I don’t know, because of course he’d just get a replacement and crow about it. He’d also told the judge he proudly threatened the protestors.
Things make little sense in 2A white America.
When the ignorant law makers write obtuse and ridiculous laws, these things happen. I also think these two are idiots as well. Sitting on your porch, with a rifle on your lap, silently watching for someone to trespass is certainly lawful. They verbally engaged with people in the street and "brandished" weapons. Both VERY stupid, especially with a mob.
Reply
#8
When the ignorant law makers write obtuse and ridiculous laws, these things happen. I also think these two are idiots as well. Sitting on your porch, with a rifle on your lap, silently watching for someone to trespass is certainly lawful. They verbally engaged with people in the street and "brandished" weapons. Both VERY stupid, especially with a mob.

The use of the term mob is prejudicial. A mob is what happened in DC in January, this was a protest demonstration.
Reply
#9
not with what they were yelling.
Reply
#10
Seems we have different definitions of the term 'mob'.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)