Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
can you handle the truth?!....in new interview, Paul McCartney reveals why the 'Beatles' brokeup....
#1
....he says John Lennon was responsible (but this is his viewpoint, so who knows if the 'absolute' truth)....


Paul McCartney says John Lennon responsible for Beatles breakup

Speaking on an episode of BBC Radio 4’s “This Cultural Life”, McCartney said it was John Lennon who wanted to disband The Beatles.

....Paul McCartney has revisited the breakup of The Beatles, flatly refuting the suggestion that he was responsible for the group’s demise.

Speaking on an episode of BBC Radio 4’s “This Cultural Life” that is scheduled to air on Oct. 23, McCartney said it was John Lennon who wanted to disband The Beatles.

“I didn’t instigate the split,” McCartney said. “That was our Johnny.”

The band’s fans have long debated who was responsible for the breakup, with many blaming McCartney. But McCartney said Lennon’s desire to “break lose" was the main driver behind the split.

Confusion about the breakup was allowed to fester because their manager asked the band members to keep quiet until he concluded a number of business deals, McCartney said.

The interview comes ahead Peter Jackson’s six-hour documentary chronicling the final months of the band. “The Beatles: Get Back,” set for release in November on Disney+, is certain to revisit the breakup of the legendary band. McCartney’s comments were first reported by The Observer.

When asked by interviewer John Wilson about the decision to strike out on his own, McCartney retorted: “Stop right there. I am not the person who instigated the split. Oh no, no, no. John walked into a room one day and said, ‘I am leaving The Beatles.’ Is that instigating the split, or not?”

McCartney expressed sadness over the breakup, saying the group was still making “pretty good stuff.”

“This was my band, this was my job, this was my life. So I wanted it to continue,” McCartney said.



is this the truth.......?!
Reply
#2
By 68, the Beatles had become a bad marriage. I do wish they could have kept it together for business reasons
Reply
#3
He said something similar on Howard Stern recently.
Reply
#4
The Beatles broke up because John and Paul were both sick of each other's shit.

They both had a point.
Reply
#5
Acer wrote:
He said something similar on Howard Stern recently.

I don't know if I'd call it recently, but yeah. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azq8ud8oiLY
Reply
#6
I’d read something similar years ago, so I’m not sure this is “news.”

The story is that they had a misunderstanding/disagreement and that John thought Paul wanted to quit or kill the band, and he did it “proactively.”

My point: Does it matter “who” when the reality is that they-all-were-done. Maybe not Ringo necessarily but George knew things were dysfunctional and held back some songs as a result of the vibe.

Most of this “blame game” comes from the emotion of a famous and great band stopping at what could arguably be called their peak: Abbey Road.
Reply
#7
I think George and Ringo each quit at different times.
Reply
#8
Dennis S wrote:
I think George and Ringo each quit at different times.

Yes, correct. And the version Paul is recently telling has been accounted for as being originally told many years ago.
Reply
#9
Let it be.
Reply
#10
"George knew things were dysfunctional and held back some songs as a result of the vibe. "

"Let it be. "

yup
and
yup.

Mull of Kintyre is the Chuck Schumer of pop music.
“Art is how we decorate space.
Music is how we decorate time.”
Jean-Michel Basquiat







Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)