Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The US Military Conducted an anti-vaccine disinformation campaign on social media, started under Trump and continued und
#1
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024...eport.html

The Pentagon on Friday stood by its decision to conduct a clandestine disinformation campaign in the Philippines in 2020 that aimed to sow doubt about China's COVID-19 vaccine during the height of the global pandemic -- a campaign that was first revealed in a bombshell report by Reuters.

The U.S. military launched the disinformation campaign following a decision by then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper to loosen restrictions on such operations, and used phony online accounts posing as Filipinos in an effort "to discredit China's Sinovac inoculation -- payback for Beijing's efforts to blame Washington for the pandemic," Reuters reported. At the time, the Philippines was struggling to vaccinate its population and had one of the worst death rates in the region.

The Philippines disinformation campaign marks an unusual use of military power in a country that has often been a U.S. ally in a strategically crucial region and at a time of great public health risks. Lisa Lawrence, a Defense Department spokeswoman, did not deny Reuters' reporting on the operation, which was done under the administration of former President Donald Trump and continued for some time under the Biden administration.

The Pentagon "conducts a wide range of operations, including operations in the information environment (OIE), to counter adversary malign influence" and "this process is deliberate, methodical, and comprehensive," Lawrence said in a statement. "The DoD uses a variety of platforms, including social media, to counter those malign influence attacks."...

The social media activity began during Trump's administration when Esper signed a secret order that made it easier for commanders to compete with Russia and China by enabling them to bypass the State Department when conducting information warfare against the two countries, Reuters reported.

The report also noted that the program "continued months into Joe Biden's presidency ... even after alarmed social media executives warned the new administration that the Pentagon had been trafficking in COVID misinformation."

Experts have long objected to the use of vaccines and vaccination campaigns as part of military operations, arguing that they not only lead to a loss of trust and confidence in vaccines as a whole but have also endangered medical workers.

Perhaps the biggest outrage came after it was revealed in 2011 that the CIA used a fake hepatitis vaccination program as part of its efforts to track down and kill Osama bin Laden, who was hiding in Pakistan.

The ruse led to outrage from doctors worldwide and a promise in 2014 from the CIA not to use immunization programs as cover for its operations in the future.

However, the damage had been done, and backlash against unrelated polio vaccination efforts in the region took hold. Attacks against vaccination workers continue to this day. Pakistan and Afghanistan are now the only two countries that have yet to be declared free of wild poliovirus type 1.
Reply
#2
Confusedmiley-shocked003::facepalm:
Reply
#3
Sounds like the military's long time habit of using the Philippians as their own personal test lab.
Reply
#4
"continued for some time under the Biden administration."

How long?
Reply
#5
Acer wrote:
"continued for some time under the Biden administration."

How long?

From the Reuters story:

"It was terminated in mid-2021... The Biden White House issued an edict in spring 2021 banning the anti-vax effort, which also disparaged vaccines produced by other rivals, and the Pentagon initiated an internal review, Reuters found."
Reply
#6
Tiangou wrote:
[quote=Acer]
"continued for some time under the Biden administration."

How long?

From the Reuters story:

"It was terminated in mid-2021... The Biden White House issued an edict in spring 2021 banning the anti-vax effort, which also disparaged vaccines produced by other rivals, and the Pentagon initiated an internal review, Reuters found."
Obviously not knowing the intricacies and ramifications of such circumstances, while I would have hoped for better, I can conceive of circumstances — protecting sources, keeping exact methods of operation as ‘black boxed’ from adversaries as possible and of course ever present institutional pushback and inertia — where a three or fourth frame of time might not be an outrageous window for halting such a program.

But allowance for such still requires some element of faith.
Reply
#7
Blankity Blank wrote:
[quote=Tiangou]
[quote=Acer]
"continued for some time under the Biden administration."

How long?

From the Reuters story:

"It was terminated in mid-2021... The Biden White House issued an edict in spring 2021 banning the anti-vax effort, which also disparaged vaccines produced by other rivals, and the Pentagon initiated an internal review, Reuters found."
Obviously not knowing the intricacies and ramifications of such circumstances, while I would have hoped for better, I can conceive of circumstances — protecting sources, keeping exact methods of operation as ‘black boxed’ from adversaries as possible and of course ever present institutional pushback and inertia — where a three or fourth frame of time might not be an outrageous window for halting such a program.

But allowance for such still requires some element of faith.
It may simply have gotten a new name and no longer been so easily discoverable by reporters.

...And in February, the contractor that worked on the anti-vax campaign — General Dynamics IT — won a $493 million contract. Its mission: to continue providing clandestine influence services for the military.
Reply
#8
Tiangou wrote:
[quote=Blankity Blank]
[quote=Tiangou]
[quote=Acer]
"continued for some time under the Biden administration."

How long?

From the Reuters story:

"It was terminated in mid-2021... The Biden White House issued an edict in spring 2021 banning the anti-vax effort, which also disparaged vaccines produced by other rivals, and the Pentagon initiated an internal review, Reuters found."
Obviously not knowing the intricacies and ramifications of such circumstances, while I would have hoped for better, I can conceive of circumstances — protecting sources, keeping exact methods of operation as ‘black boxed’ from adversaries as possible and of course ever present institutional pushback and inertia — where a three or fourth frame of time might not be an outrageous window for halting such a program.

But allowance for such still requires some element of faith.
It may simply have gotten a new name and no longer been so easily discoverable by reporters.

...And in February, the contractor that worked on the anti-vax campaign — General Dynamics IT — won a $493 million contract. Its mission: to continue providing clandestine influence services for the military.
Certainly possible, though it doesn’t seem like (to my untrained eye) a high enough priority type endeavor to risk the kind of blowback/reputational damage that would go along with anyone finding out it was still active with it so recently having eyes on it. And certainly not with what would be such a clumsily obvious reviving.
Reply
#9
Tiangou wrote:
[quote=Acer]
"continued for some time under the Biden administration."

How long?

From the Reuters story:

"It was terminated in mid-2021... The Biden White House issued an edict in spring 2021 banning the anti-vax effort, which also disparaged vaccines produced by other rivals, and the Pentagon initiated an internal review, Reuters found."
Well, considering Biden only took office at the end of January 2021, and…umm…had his hands full with a few other things at the time, him saying cut it out in “spring ‘21” isn’t too bad.

But it’s not the first time we’ve f-ed around with vaccination:

CIA organised fake vaccination drive to get Osama bin Laden's family DNA

This really ought to be verboten. African Americans were rightfully suspicious of American medicine and doctors after the Tuskegee Syphilis Study was exposed; we keep giving people worldwide reason to be suspicious of American public health efforts.
Reply
#10
The article doesn't say exactly when those "alarmed social media executives warned the new administration." or how long after the warning Biden banned the program. "Spring" began one month after inauguration and extended to late June. The absence of exact dates in this description tells me that the writer was manipulating the reader's sense of time to heighten the level of outrage. And maybe to shift the outrage onto the shoulders of the Biden administration rather than the Trump administration.

Does anyone recall that the Trump administration failed to prepare an orderly transition?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)