Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Troopergate update-- turns out Palin's chief of staff did approve Commish's trip to seek funds-- so much for claims of i
#1
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/2...2366.shtml
What a mess.
Palin Disputed In Troopergate Probe
Document Reveals Trip To Washington Supposedly Unauthorized Was Approved By Her Office

Sept. 20, 2008

(CBS/AP) Just when it seemed the Alaska investigation into Gov. Sarah Palin's firing of a state official might have been scuttled by the pressures of presidential politics, another turn of events has kept it going.

Palin's firing of Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan last July, allegedly after pressure by her, her husband and staff members on Monegan to fire her ex-brother-in-law was ignored, is at the center of the investigation (known as Troopergate) into whether Palin abused her power.

Palin originally agreed to participate in the investigation, authorized in July by the Republican-controlled legislature. She told Alaskans, "Hold me accountable." Once named to the McCain ticket, however, Palin backpedaled. She has since refused to testify.

Palin has maintained that she fired Monegan not over the status of Trooper Mike Wooten, but over budget disagreements - specifically a trip Monegan planned to Washington which she said was unauthorized.

Earlier this week the McCain campaign released a series of e-mails detailing the frustration several Palin administration officials experienced in dealing with Monegan. The "last straw," the campaign said, was a trip Monegan planned in July to seek federal money for investigating and prosecuting sexual assault cases.

Palin, saying she did not authorize the expenses for the travel, cited that trip as a primary example of the insubordination that led to Monegan's firing.

However, Palin's chief of staff did authorize the travel to Washington.

A travel authorization document signed by Palin's Chief of Staff Mike Nizich on June 18 approved Monegan's trip to Washington for the purpose of meeting Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

The document's existence was first reported by ABC News on Friday.

Monegan told ABC that the travel authorization was explicitly to pursue funding for the anti-sexual-violence program, though the document does not state that as a reason for the trip.

McCain spokesman Taylor Griffin said Friday that the travel authorization was for a routine trip, and that state commissioners regularly travel to meet members of Alaska's congressional delegation.

"He was not authorized to lobby Congress," Griffin said.

The revelation came on the same day that several individuals subpoenaed to testify in Troopergate refused to appear as ordered.

Those who refused to answer their subpoenas (including Todd Palin, the Governor's husband; Randy Ruaro, the governor's deputy chief of staff; and aide Ivy Frye) will be referred to the full Senate for contempt, said Sen. Hollis French, who is heading the investigation.
Reply
#2
I'm not horribly surprised -- I've been reading a few different articles which suggest that Palin's explanation for why she fired Monegan has repeatedly changed over time. If she were telling the truth, wouldn't there be one major explanation for it, rather than several that change over time?

I'm getting the distinct impression that everything we're now learning about Palin is only the tip of the iceberg-- that there's tons left to be discovered, and that there may very well be a "bombshell" waiting to explode. For example, apparently the hacked emails were NOT as boring as originally thought -- amongst the titles of some of the emails were the following: “FW: Motor Fuel Tax Suspension”, “FW: CONFIDENTIAL Ethics Matter”, “Draft letter to Governor Schwarzenegger / Container Tax”, “RE: Using Royalty Oil to Lower the Cost of Fuel for Alaskans”, “Court of Appeals http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appellate_court / Executive Director Parole Board / Boards and Commissions” and “FW: DPS Personnel and Budget Issues”. “DPS” is the acronym for the Alaska Department of Public Safety, who supervise the Alaskan state troopers.
Reply
#3
Paperclip gate unfolds!
Reply
#4
guitarist wrote:
Paperclip gate unfolds!

:nuts:
Reply
#5
Oh for Pete's sake, download the PDF and read the email exchange. You might find, starting at page 6 interesting.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TW...ion%20.PDF

This PDF shows Monegan's travel request was signed 6/18, but it was a blank document and the date of "submission" (I guess that's what the 6/19 refers to) was the following day.

http://abcnews.go.com/images/Blotter/TA.pdf

So hatchet falls on Palin's COS for signing a blank travel authorization. Apparently no one knew at that point that Monegan was going to DC to seek funding from an Alaskan Congressman. They used to call this "going outside the chain of command". He had no authority to negotiate funds for the state of Alaska.

Don't shoot the messanger, please. Just giving you the links and I will not discuss further.
Reply
#6
Touche! These animated emoticons are hysterical.

Hey, be thankful my post was only three words.

This symbol represents the endless blather of what my contributions here usually look like:

Confusedoapbox:
Reply
#7
There's surely a better one for you, but I'll have to look for it when I have more time. ..
Reply
#8
swampy wrote:
Oh for Pete's sake, download the PDF and read the email exchange. You might find, starting at page 6 interesting.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TW...ion%20.PDF

This PDF shows Monegan's travel request was signed 6/18, but it was a blank document and the date of "submission" (I guess that's what the 6/19 refers to) was the following day.

http://abcnews.go.com/images/Blotter/TA.pdf

So hatchet falls on Palin's COS for signing a blank travel authorization. Apparently no one knew at that point that Monegan was going to DC to seek funding from an Alaskan Congressman. They used to call this "going outside the chain of command". He had no authority to negotiate funds for the state of Alaska.

Don't shoot the messanger, please. Just giving you the links and I will not discuss further.

I stand solidly by my initial commentary:
what a mess.
Reply
#9
For McCain opponents there is much more to be gained by focusing on her previous stated positions and policies than anything you'll get from personal attacks. Just point out those policy decisions and statements, she's further off the rails than the current administration.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)