Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Friday Afternoon iTunes Poll
#1
Just wondering...
Reply
#2
What's wrong with AIFF?

(come on... you guys need to buy more hard drive space anyways right? Smile )
Reply
#3
'cause my other music devices use .mp3 (or, in one case, .wma (gasp)). That's howcome.
Reply
#4
I started ripping at 256kpbs MP3 back in the day, have since switched to 256kpbs AAC which is really quite good enough for me.

If I were to start all over again I would go with Apple Lossless since I know I have the space.
Reply
#5
I rip to Apple Lossless these days, and wish iTunes would then transcode those to sync as 320AAC.
Reply
#6
hanna montana, jonas, taylor swift, selena gomez and demi lovato all sound the same in whatever format my kids force me to listen them in...
Reply
#7
I ripped my CDs at 320kbps, but have thought about creating an
alternative Apple lossless library, now that storage is so cheap.
I have nearly 600 CDs, so that would work out to only a couple of
hundred gigabytes of hard drive space for lossless files.

If I could only find the time....
Reply
#8
Mostly 256 mp3, just for compatibility.
Reply
#9
Eh?
Reply
#10
RAMd®d wrote:
I rip to Apple Lossless these days, and wish iTunes would then transcode those to sync as 320AAC.

Is this question about "syncing" automatically . . . i.e. not just having iTunes transcode to 320AAC. I can get you to 320AAC if that is the only question, but, I fear it is about the automatic syncing that we know doesn't currently happen. . .


:pimp:
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)