![]() |
Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats (/showthread.php?tid=167028) |
Re: Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats - vision63 - 05-09-2014 deckeda wrote: $$$$, that's why. It's "all" about money. Nothing else. Not even a little bit else. Not even a scintilla, fragment else. Beats by Dre, prints money. Re: Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats - graylocks - 05-09-2014 maybe they are buying beats to take them off the market and free the audio landscape from the scourge. Apple - using their billions for the greater good. Re: Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats - sekker - 05-09-2014 graylocks wrote: Awesome! I wish... Re: Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats - macphanatic - 05-09-2014 Which phone manufacturer has Beats Audio? Re: Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats - mrbigstuff - 05-09-2014 macphanatic wrote: HTC does. Perhaps others do, too, I don't know. Re: Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats - vision63 - 05-09-2014 macphanatic wrote: Used to be HTC. They just released a Harmon Kardon edition HTC One M8. Comes with HK headphones and you can buy an HK $400 HK bluetooth speaker for $100. And it's already got the front facing BoomSound speakers. Bomb phone. http://www.htc.com/us/smartphones/htc-one-m8-harman-kardon/ Re: Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats - ka jowct - 05-09-2014 Lew Zealand wrote: Yes. You should in fact associate it with poor quality audio reproduction. My impression of those headphones is that they are not designed for natural, accurate sound. Right or wrong? Re: Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats - deckeda - 05-09-2014 ka jowct wrote: Yes. You should in fact associate it with poor quality audio reproduction. My impression of those headphones is that they are not designed for natural, accurate sound. Right or wrong? Right. They are status symbols, but not just of fashion, but false symbols of good sound. That said, I'm a subjectivist when it comes to music and music reproduction; there are no "facts" that can "prove" a certain technology for example, "must" sound better. It's for that belief that notions of A-B or A-B-X sound tests aren't just irrelevant scientifically, but are far worse: they "prove" whatever the test is set up to do (which is usually something other than what any conclusions drawn reveal.) So if/when a listener prefers Beats headphones it doesn't "make them wrong" in my view ... but I reserve the right to question what experience they have with such things as live, un-amplified music or music that's not heavily dependent on processed special effects. Re: Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats - The Grim Ninja - 05-09-2014 If Apple only bought them for the subscription service, perhaps they'll sell the headphones to someone else. Re: Reports: Apple set to acquire headphone maker Beats - silvarios - 05-09-2014 jdc wrote: Yes, it is wrong. Do you have a definition of thugs and hoodlum that fits the actual dictionary text, or do you simply mean a specific type of young man? |