Speedy wrote:
Who cares if it is BS, 40,000,000 Trump supporters believe it is true. And more than a few of them think she should get the electric chair.

mrbigstuff wrote:
[quote=Speedy]
Who cares if it is BS, 40,000,000 Trump supporters believe it is true. And more than a few of them think she should get the electric chair.

Wags wrote:
I can hardly wait for Michelle to run for office. That should really tilt them over.

AllGold wrote:
What bothers me is there are more than a few who are not necessarily Trump supporters who are buying into the never ending Hillary scandal B.S. that the GOP has been manufacturing for years. The problem is those people don't like Trump but think they can't vote for Clinton because of all the crap that has been (and still is being) spewed.

max wrote:
[quote=AllGold]
What bothers me is there are more than a few who are not necessarily Trump supporters who are buying into the never ending Hillary scandal B.S. that the GOP has been manufacturing for years. The problem is those people don't like Trump but think they can't vote for Clinton because of all the crap that has been (and still is being) spewed.

AllGold wrote:
[quote=max]
[quote=AllGold]
What bothers me is there are more than a few who are not necessarily Trump supporters who are buying into the never ending Hillary scandal B.S. that the GOP has been manufacturing for years. The problem is those people don't like Trump but think they can't vote for Clinton because of all the crap that has been (and still is being) spewed.

In 2012, she reportedly proposed to the White House — along with CIA Director David Petraeus — a covert program (apparently larger than the one later authorized) to provide arms to vetted Syrian rebel groups fighting Bashar al-Assad’s government. Obama opposed this proposal on the grounds that there could be no guarantees of where the weapons would ultimately end up and that CIA analysts determined they would not have “materially” hastened the removal of Assad from power..

When the civil war in Syria broke out in 2011, Clinton acted on these views. She pressured the Obama administration to take a more militaristic approach, to arm and train even more rebels than it did, the Times reports.
This is consistent with an August 2014 interview in the Atlantic, in which Clinton blithely wrote off diplomacy in the war in Syria, instead calling for backing the “hard men with the guns.”

Even critics understate how catastrophically bad the Hillary Clinton-led NATO bombing of Libya was... ....the president does have enormous power when it comes to international affairs, diplomacy and war. This makes foreign policy one of the most crucial issues in any presidential campaign.

Clinton’s leadership in the catastrophic war in Libya should ergo constantly be at the forefront of any discussion of the presidential primary.

Throughout the campaign, Clinton has tried to have her cake and eat it too. She has flaunted her leadership in the war as a sign of her supposed foreign policy experience, yet, at the same moment, strived to distance herself from the disastrous results of said war.

Today, Libya is in ruins. The seven months of NATO bombing effectively destroyed the government and left behind a political vacuum. Much of this has been filled by extremist groups.

Millions of Libyans live without a formal government. The internationally recognized government only controls the eastern part of the country. Rivaled extremist Islamist groups have seized much of the country.