![]() |
Did E. Jean Carroll get any penny from CFDT? - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Did E. Jean Carroll get any penny from CFDT? (/showthread.php?tid=292162) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: Did E. Jean Carroll get any penny from CFDT? - Lux Interior - 11-27-2024 gabester wrote: I am sure you're being sarcastic or humorous, but with the rhetoric emanating from the right, it doesn't seem impossible the way it once ought to have. Well, I would like to be. She'll probably just die from gravity poisoning. Re: Did E. Jean Carroll get any penny from CFDT? - special - 11-27-2024 PeterB wrote: As long as the Senate does not find him guilty in an impeachment trial, he will be free. Re: Did E. Jean Carroll get any penny from CFDT? - DeusxMac - 11-28-2024 PeterB wrote: ![]() Re: Did E. Jean Carroll get any penny from CFDT? - Ombligo - 11-28-2024 Melania better be careful , he wouldn't be the first King to avoid the prenupt. ![]() Re: Did E. Jean Carroll get any penny from CFDT? - PeterB - 11-28-2024 special wrote: As long as the Senate does not find him guilty in an impeachment trial, he will be free. And the chances of the Senate finding him guilty in an impeachment trial = less than zero. Re: Did E. Jean Carroll get any penny from CFDT? - special - 11-28-2024 PeterB wrote: As long as the Senate does not find him guilty in an impeachment trial, he will be free. And the chances of the Senate finding him guilty in an impeachment trial = less than zero. TRUE. he is the only person in the USA who can kill someone in plain view and get away with it. Re: Did E. Jean Carroll get any penny from CFDT? - gabester - 11-28-2024 special wrote: And the chances of the Senate finding him guilty in an impeachment trial = less than zero. TRUE. he is the only person in the USA who can kill someone in plain view and ... and be acquitted of it by a jury of his peers - a group of wealthy oligarchs who ensure there is indeed a two tiered system of justice benefitting those with wealth. An acquittal doesn't mean he didn't do it or that he isn't guilty of the crime, just that the prosecution did not adequately prove its case. We all know OJ was guilty, even if the glove didn't fit. Re: Did E. Jean Carroll get any penny from CFDT? - pdq - 11-29-2024 Ombligo wrote: When did that change? When the Paula Jones civil suit was initiated against a sitting president (Bill Clinton), the SCOTUS decided (unanimously!) that the president had plenty of free time to defend himself against civil suits, and that no one was above the law, even when it was a civil suit funded by the Scaifes and other political enemies of the president. As we probably all remember, the case (involving an allegation of a very clumsy but brief exposure of genitalia in a hotel room - no contact) was ultimately settled for $850K only after it was dismissed in court for lacking legal merit, as the Federal judge ruled that Jones did not prove damages. even if the event had occurred as alleged. But honest-to-God sexual assault, as adjudicated by a jury? The current president can’t be bothered by that now? |