+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: McCain camp on the defensive re: Troopergate (/showthread.php?tid=62253)
Re: McCain camp on the defensive re: Troopergate - DaviDC. - 09-20-2008
I've known plenty of kids that needed to be Tased, whether they asked for it or not.
When was it decided that a pain-free childhood is guaranteed?
Re: McCain camp on the defensive re: Troopergate - Black Landlord - 09-20-2008
Bill in NC wrote:
Like I said, not even Gravel believes that.
But even he (no friend of Palin) agreed the guy needed to go.
[quote=Black Landlord]
[quote=Bill in NC]
C'mon BL, nobody believes that.
This can only hurt the Democrats.
"the firing of the commisioner was =unrelated= to the trooper"
Are you trying to be funny? This is verbatim from the article linked above. Palin's camp's stance is that the commish was fired due to other. . . wait, why am I basically reading the article to you? Is it your bedtime?
Dear Bill in NC, please read the damn article before trying to participate in a thread discussing the content of an article.
Hi Bill in NC! Could you please read the article and report back when you've done so?
Thanks!
Re: McCain camp on the defensive re: Troopergate - Black Landlord - 09-20-2008
MacMagus wrote:
> Palin's camp's stance is that the commish was fired due to other.
Yeah, but he had a spotless record. No complaints until after Troopergate hit the news.
As a general rule, one makes a case for firing a person in a high management position before firing him.
I was trying to get the discussion back on point-- would think you'd be willing to help. This is the forum equivalent of a dog staring at your finger when you point to something.