bah HUMbug!. . .guys, say goodbye..no more hummers. . .!

[davester]

The H2 is simply a Suburban with an ugly and cramped body bolted on top. It is not a good offroad vehicle because the suspension parts are too lightweight for the load. The suburban is a better vehicle. The H3 is similar and smaller, based on a pickup.

Hummer fail... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxrdwXXat14

Neither of them have any relation to the military humvee or to the H1 (a humvee converted to street use and out of production for the last three years.

[OWC Jamie]

The H3 gets better mileage than a Mercedes E63, Jeep Cherokee 6 cyl. Saabs and many vans and full sized pick-ups.
Not much better, but it's not the vilified fuel whore pundits and haters make it out to be. One can do much worse for less money.

[davester]

The H3 isn't even in the same class as most of those vehicles, heck the E63 is a 500 hp high performance sedan. It has way less cargo capacity (63 cu ft) than even the miniscule and thrifty Toyota RAV 4 (73 cu ft) so comparing it to full size vans and pickups is not appropriate. It is simply not a practical vehicle...all show and no go.

[JPK]

Not quite the "buy our tanks from China" metaphor, but close!

JPK

[OWC Jamie]

A Sprinter van has 500+ cubic feet of cargo space and isn't in the same class, either.
Woohoo.