Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who is "Pete"??
#11
Here is some of his handiwork:

As Sunshine Fettkeather approaches Area 51 in cult infamy, Ruby Ridge, Unabomber, Militia, Waco, Hillary, Guns, Butter, Columbine, Cchelsea, Missile, Bill, Clinton, Terror, White, experiment, anthrax, kill, infrastructure, Black, Police, VAT, NO, strike, FBI, heart, attack, tyrant, Filegate, patriot, CIA, blood, NSA, revolution, GMT, pot, DEA, fertilizer, BATF, Monica, Whitwater, Iran-Contra, Commie, Star Wars, Vince Foster, wound, maim, rape, release, shoot, pillage, proletariat, freedom, covert, posse, oppress, and struggle, are words which, in toto, may, in the view of spooks and snoops, constitute a threat which could justifiably provoke a flying blast of an explosive government-wide response! Would they then be members of the Falatulent Earth Ssociety, or is this just plane crazy?
Lafayettepete
Lafayette, CA USA -
Reply
#12
Lafinfil, thank you. I appreciate the full explanation.
Reply
#13
Black Landlord wrote:
[quote=lafinfil]

It appears that he is very far from Pete geographically and posting from the bastion on liberalism in a place that
I doubt pete would be caught dead in.

There you have it in a nutshell ... so to speak

The blog also claims he is 14 years old.
That's about right for Pete - emotionally

: - )
Reply
#14
Black Landlord wrote:
OK, I'm sorry I responded above and fed this thread because I just read the one where this came up.
Sam could have asked her question right in the thread where it was being discussed and got an answer, but she started a new one to push her little agenda, as usual.
Bad form.


To push my own agenda? Jez Louise...I simply asked a question to get an answer. Is that pushing one's own agenda? It was a legit question just like asking who makes xyz. People on the board kept putting the name out and I didn't connect.

Thanks lafinfil...Now I know.
Reply
#15
samintx wrote:
[quote=Black Landlord]
OK, I'm sorry I responded above and fed this thread because I just read the one where this came up.
Sam could have asked her question right in the thread where it was being discussed and got an answer, but she started a new one to push her little agenda, as usual.
Bad form.


To push my own agenda? Jez Louise...I simply asked a question to get an answer. Is that pushing one's own agenda? It was a legit question just like asking who makes xyz. People on the board kept putting the name out and I didn't connect.

Thanks lafinfil...Now I know.
Yes. You started a new thread to call more attention to "pete", and the fact that he seemed to be an irritant for people who you don't agree with politically. You were trying to fan the flames of controversy and hoping to make the more left leaning users look bad in the process.
Your style is now consistently being described as "hit and run" by others. You don't value this side of the board as a place to discuss and learn, but only to try to irritate those who don't agree with you politically. You've proclaimed that you don't read any of the threads here when called on it.

Bad form.
Reply
#16
Oh, you are soooooooooooooo wrong. That never entered my mind. You are assessing traits to people when you don't even know them. That might apply to others but NOT TO ME !
Reply
#17
samintx wrote:
To push my own agenda? Jez Louise...I simply asked a question to get an answer. Is that pushing one's own agenda? It was a legit question just like asking who makes xyz.

While psychological terms like "cognitive dissonance" are being thrown about, I might as well add another germane one: passive aggression.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)