11-18-2009, 09:56 PM
Seacrest wrote:
They oughta ban a lot of the TV PROGRAMMES, if you axe me.
Don't have an axe handy ... would it be ok if I used a hatchet?
TVs Banned in Calif.
|
11-18-2009, 09:56 PM
Seacrest wrote: Don't have an axe handy ... would it be ok if I used a hatchet?
11-19-2009, 01:28 AM
timg wrote: Not hardly. Panasonic's current plasma NeoPDP-based sets are mid-range in energy consumption relative to LCD-based sets. Panasonic claims further significant energy consumption improvements in next year's models. http://greenly.tv/panasonic-neo-pdp-plas...per-green/
11-19-2009, 05:52 AM
Article Accelerator wrote: Not hardly. Panasonic's current plasma NeoPDP-based sets are mid-range in energy consumption relative to LCD-based sets. Panasonic claims further significant energy consumption improvements in next year's models. http://greenly.tv/panasonic-neo-pdp-plas...per-green/ Maybe, but I'm still hanging on to my old power sucking PDP-8/E ! ![]()
11-19-2009, 02:40 PM
They oughta ban a lot of the TV PROGRAMMES... They should ban British TV shows?
11-19-2009, 05:28 PM
It bugs me how they pick and choose what things are environmentally friendly, and which are not. Somehow I think more energy is wasted from bad traffic in CA than from the 24% of TVs that don't meet their standards.
Making traffic better would also greatly boost the economy, while requiring TVs to use less energy does not.
11-19-2009, 06:08 PM
What M A V I C said.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|