Posts: 4,343
Threads: 408
Joined: Jan 2017
Lux Interior wrote:
[quote=karsen]
As for why the tasering incident wasn't reported for 2 years and was first brought to light in divorce procedures that seems fairly obvious to me. Either the wife didn't want to upset her husband by reporting the incident (if the guy is tasing children I hate to imagine the other abuses going on in that household), or she was using it as leverage in the divorce. Likely both.
Wow. You know a lot about this case. It's fairly obvious that you have some inside source.
Don't you have anything better to do than attack me all day long?
Posts: 7,564
Threads: 643
Joined: Sep 2024
Reputation:
0
[quote karsen]
Heck, read the Constitution for several references to God.
.
Posts: 8,608
Threads: 63
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Even Mike Gravel thinks the guy should have been gone - his opinion was that if the union couldn't get off their butts, somebody needed to.
I can't believe anyone would be unwise enough to try and use this for political gain - once a voter hears "child was Tasered" the effort to smear her boomerangs (or continues to distract everyone even in the face of a 1000 point loss in the DJIA)
Posts: 8,608
Threads: 63
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
C'mon BL, nobody believes that.
This can only hurt the Democrats.
"the firing of the commisioner was =unrelated= to the trooper"
Posts: 8,225
Threads: 431
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
0
> Palin's camp's stance is that the commish was fired due to other.
Yeah, but he had a spotless record. No complaints until after Troopergate hit the news.
As a general rule, one makes a case for firing a person in a high management position before firing him.