Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
8K matures at CES
#8
M A V I C wrote:
[quote=mikebw]
It's not the number of pixels, but the SIZE that matters...

You would have enjoyed my 42" plasma - 640x480.
Heh, so just a bit larger than .05" x .05" per pixel I figure, not accounting for pixel pitch. Versus what, .017" for HD? .008" for 4K?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
8K matures at CES - by Drew - 01-06-2017, 08:45 AM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by mrbigstuff - 01-06-2017, 12:48 PM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by Bill in NC - 01-06-2017, 01:40 PM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by Filliam H. Muffman - 01-06-2017, 04:32 PM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by Grateful11 - 01-06-2017, 05:26 PM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by mikebw - 01-06-2017, 05:46 PM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by M A V I C - 01-06-2017, 07:09 PM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by mikebw - 01-06-2017, 09:21 PM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by sekker - 01-06-2017, 09:24 PM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by pRICE cUBE - 01-06-2017, 09:58 PM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by Lew Zealand - 01-06-2017, 11:57 PM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by N-OS X-tasy! - 01-07-2017, 01:44 AM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by pRICE cUBE - 01-07-2017, 02:10 AM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by space-time - 01-07-2017, 02:11 AM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by bfd - 01-07-2017, 02:14 AM
Re: 8K matures at CES - by space-time - 01-07-2017, 02:15 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)