09-16-2006, 08:22 PM
>>Not bitter just truthful.
Cool. I don't blame anyone for faulting Epson where fault is due. The problem is that nobody else has a line of printers that compares longevity and quality wise for pro photo use. Both cannon and hp have some offerings but neither compares to Epson's line - I can do test prints on my 2400 and if i need to, move up to a 9800 and print a 40x50" print. (and yes, i do occasionally sell big prints.)
Cool. I don't blame anyone for faulting Epson where fault is due. The problem is that nobody else has a line of printers that compares longevity and quality wise for pro photo use. Both cannon and hp have some offerings but neither compares to Epson's line - I can do test prints on my 2400 and if i need to, move up to a 9800 and print a 40x50" print. (and yes, i do occasionally sell big prints.)