MacResource › My Category › 'Friendly' Political Ranting v
Hillary 3rd?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Hillary 3rd?
Gutenberg Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 7,265
Threads: 745
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 0
#2
01-04-2008, 03:56 AM
Neither Iowa nor New Hampshire is a particularly good predictor of who will win the nomination. Candidates aim for the top three in those states. The winner may get some cash coming in because of the win, but it's no assurance of anything else.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Hillary 3rd? - by blooz - 01-04-2008, 03:43 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by Gutenberg - 01-04-2008, 03:56 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by (vikm) - 01-04-2008, 05:04 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by x-uri - 01-04-2008, 05:37 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by incognegro - 01-04-2008, 07:52 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by vision63 - 01-04-2008, 07:54 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by RgrF - 01-04-2008, 09:33 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by cbelt3 - 01-04-2008, 04:06 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by edgarbc1 - 01-04-2008, 05:02 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by mattkime - 01-04-2008, 05:23 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by vision63 - 01-04-2008, 05:23 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by Silencio - 01-04-2008, 07:49 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by (vikm) - 01-04-2008, 08:21 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by MacArtist - 01-05-2008, 04:41 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by billb - 01-05-2008, 04:56 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by h' - 01-05-2008, 06:14 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by Jack D. - 01-05-2008, 09:05 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by kj - 01-05-2008, 09:06 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by vision63 - 01-05-2008, 10:26 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by RgrF - 01-05-2008, 01:13 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by (vikm) - 01-05-2008, 04:04 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by billb - 01-05-2008, 05:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)