Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hillary 3rd?
#9
[quote cbelt3]Yet again, our defective election system makes a bunch of yahoos in Iowa the most important people in the US.

just let the states primaries run in order of available electorate votes. You know, California first.

LIke the yahoos in Calif. know any better than Iowa's yahoos...
your logic with that argument
seems elitist and not very democratic (with little d and big D)

why not let the big electoral states form their own nation and let the peon
states cecede and be independent nation states..

I bet you would have the same bickering about who goes first between the
big electoral states...

Hillary lost... get over it..
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Hillary 3rd? - by blooz - 01-04-2008, 03:43 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by Gutenberg - 01-04-2008, 03:56 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by (vikm) - 01-04-2008, 05:04 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by x-uri - 01-04-2008, 05:37 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by incognegro - 01-04-2008, 07:52 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by vision63 - 01-04-2008, 07:54 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by RgrF - 01-04-2008, 09:33 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by cbelt3 - 01-04-2008, 04:06 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by edgarbc1 - 01-04-2008, 05:02 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by mattkime - 01-04-2008, 05:23 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by vision63 - 01-04-2008, 05:23 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by Silencio - 01-04-2008, 07:49 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by (vikm) - 01-04-2008, 08:21 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by MacArtist - 01-05-2008, 04:41 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by billb - 01-05-2008, 04:56 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by h' - 01-05-2008, 06:14 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by Jack D. - 01-05-2008, 09:05 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by kj - 01-05-2008, 09:06 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by vision63 - 01-05-2008, 10:26 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by RgrF - 01-05-2008, 01:13 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by (vikm) - 01-05-2008, 04:04 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by billb - 01-05-2008, 05:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)