Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hillary 3rd?
#18
>>And what would that be ?
Elitist snobs ?

No kidding. Iowa's exactly what it should be--part of our diverse country. No reason everywhere has to be a dang junior 'frisco, or something. Unless he meant it isn't a representative sample, which would make more sense. Of course, I don't know if any state would be a representative sample of the U.S.

As far as Hillary, I haven't seen anything that would indicate where she stands, on anything. It's frustrating to try to find any substance in what she says. I can't imagine that people like that. kj.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Hillary 3rd? - by blooz - 01-04-2008, 03:43 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by Gutenberg - 01-04-2008, 03:56 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by (vikm) - 01-04-2008, 05:04 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by x-uri - 01-04-2008, 05:37 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by incognegro - 01-04-2008, 07:52 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by vision63 - 01-04-2008, 07:54 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by RgrF - 01-04-2008, 09:33 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by cbelt3 - 01-04-2008, 04:06 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by edgarbc1 - 01-04-2008, 05:02 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by mattkime - 01-04-2008, 05:23 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by vision63 - 01-04-2008, 05:23 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by Silencio - 01-04-2008, 07:49 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by (vikm) - 01-04-2008, 08:21 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by MacArtist - 01-05-2008, 04:41 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by billb - 01-05-2008, 04:56 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by h' - 01-05-2008, 06:14 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by Jack D. - 01-05-2008, 09:05 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by kj - 01-05-2008, 09:06 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by vision63 - 01-05-2008, 10:26 AM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by RgrF - 01-05-2008, 01:13 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by (vikm) - 01-05-2008, 04:04 PM
Re: Hillary 3rd? - by billb - 01-05-2008, 05:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)