09-24-2008, 10:15 PM
Exactly. It looks equally sensible like this, too:
"Every mistake that Biden makes proves the point that he's unqualified. Palin can say dumb things because she can also turn around and prove she knows something."
Evidence of circular logic. If candidate A. makes a mistake, it means nothing. If candidate B. makes a mistake, it proves A. is right. Really?
The campaign might want to keep Biden locked in a trophy case with his imaginary squirrels. At the rate he's going, he's more at risk of being replaced as VP candidate than Palin is.
I'd hate it if he was replaced, though. I want to hear more why he thinks his own campaign's ads are wrong, and more about those 1929 FDR television broadcasts. And I want to hear more from Palin about creationism, and her peculiar hiring and firing practices. When the campaign is over, Sarah and Joe can go hunting together, collect nuts and berries, and compare war stories. I love both of 'em.
"Every mistake that Biden makes proves the point that he's unqualified. Palin can say dumb things because she can also turn around and prove she knows something."
Evidence of circular logic. If candidate A. makes a mistake, it means nothing. If candidate B. makes a mistake, it proves A. is right. Really?
The campaign might want to keep Biden locked in a trophy case with his imaginary squirrels. At the rate he's going, he's more at risk of being replaced as VP candidate than Palin is.
I'd hate it if he was replaced, though. I want to hear more why he thinks his own campaign's ads are wrong, and more about those 1929 FDR television broadcasts. And I want to hear more from Palin about creationism, and her peculiar hiring and firing practices. When the campaign is over, Sarah and Joe can go hunting together, collect nuts and berries, and compare war stories. I love both of 'em.