Posts: 12,349
Threads: 1,831
Joined: Nov 2023
Reputation:
0
Mac-A-Matic clearly has a basic misunderstanding of the whole cause and effect thing.
' "To get a guy to buy his 29th or 30th gun, you've got to come up with a whole new frame," said Rafn.'
The referenced article makes no mention of Democrats and/or gun haters.
Posts: 12,349
Threads: 1,831
Joined: Nov 2023
Reputation:
0
No, I bought my 29th or 30th computer because of republicans and technophobes.
Posts: 12,349
Threads: 1,831
Joined: Nov 2023
Reputation:
0
There isn't one credible option for banning guns presently, and the "gun boom" to which you refer, is a classic bubble based on fear and hysteria, whipped up by your right wing handlers.
Posts: 24,926
Threads: 4,391
Joined: Nov 2024
Reputation:
0
"haters?"
You're the second person on the forum I recall using that term. Does it come from right-wing radio?
Posts: 23,025
Threads: 577
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
2
So, what you are saying is that discussing a ban on guns tends to create rush-demand for guns. Ha, ha Liberals.
Therefore, we should not discuss guns, else those who discuss bans are somehow culpable for crimes committed with rush-purchased guns. Ha, ha liberals.
But if we stop discussing guns, demand goes down, the industry suffers, and unemployment increases. Ha, ha liberals.
Posts: 2,788
Threads: 313
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
0
The level of deniability amongst these so-called "liberal" anti-gun people is astonishing.
Guess some of you have never see how rumors and gossip can pump up the stock market or any kind of hype can affect any kind of market.