If you continue to hound the admin we will lose this forum

[Bernie]

Wow. Just came over to look and maybe this isn't a good time.

[Black]

For God's sake, STOP QUOTING THE PEOPLE MOST OF US HAVE ON IGNORE!!!!

As to this forum being pulled:

1) That handwriting has been on the wall for quite a while-- make peace with it
2) If it comes to that it will be =exactly- what certain users have been trying to accomplish. But.... see #1.

[Black]

Carnos Jax wrote:
Agreed, it's best not to respond to him. As noted before, during his absence, the forum was fairly peaceful and there was good discussion going on without his attempts to derail threads. Through his trolling, he's deliberately trying to be a nuisance to the mods both indirectly and directly. I don't understand why, after the first banning, he would deliberately plot a course in the same direction again, but that's his illness. I would not take it to the mods. If he doesn't change, they will notice, and he'll be gone for good. Best to not respond when he tries to troll.

As if you weren't the one who keeps engaging him.

[Black]

$tevie wrote:
And for God's sake, if you cannot help yourself and feel you must respond to somebody that you KNOW many people have on Ignore, then be polite and don't quote them.

[Carnos Jax]

Black wrote:
[quote=Carnos Jax]
Agreed, it's best not to respond to him. As noted before, during his absence, the forum was fairly peaceful and there was good discussion going on without his attempts to derail threads. Through his trolling, he's deliberately trying to be a nuisance to the mods both indirectly and directly. I don't understand why, after the first banning, he would deliberately plot a course in the same direction again, but that's his illness. I would not take it to the mods. If he doesn't change, they will notice, and he'll be gone for good. Best to not respond when he tries to troll.

As if you weren't the one who keeps engaging him.
"keeps"? I haven't engaged him since his banning until a couple of days ago when I called him out for name calling.

[Speedy]

I'd miss both max and the forum. But I would not miss the,"you're an idiot" stuff. And engage away but attack the issue, not the person who posts the issue.

[$tevie]

Carnos Jax wrote: I haven't engaged him since his banning until a couple of days ago when I called him out for name calling.

And what did you hope that would accomplish? He was suddenly going to apologize and become a sweetie pie? You were falling into his BS again.

[max]

Carnos Jax wrote:
[quote=Black]
[quote=Carnos Jax]
Best to not respond when he tries to troll.

As if you weren't the one who keeps engaging him.
"keeps"? I haven't engaged him since his banning until a couple of days ago when I called him out for name calling. Best example of unclear on the concept...

Speedy wrote:
And engage away but attack the issue, not the person who posts the issue.

Somebody gets it....

[sekker]

I am sorry the admins have to spend ANY time on this BS.

[max]

sekker wrote:
I am sorry the admins have to spend ANY time on this BS.

Exactly, the funny part is although in al the years on these forums I have NEVER, ever ran to the mods.
Yet one just has to look at the linked thread and see who initiated all personal attacks, the very same posters waste mods time, thread after thread, the very same posters are now whining about trolling....

....Lord Voldemort