Obama's Birth Certificate Redux - Not for the Liberal faint of heart

[Doc]

Hmmm... 'Thought the petition was denied on the 6th.

Thanks for correcting me.

It was denied on the 3rd. Okay.

[$tevie]

Why did the chicken cross the road?

To kill Vince Foster.

[laarree]

Don Kiyoti wrote:

http://eclectech.co.uk/mindcontrol.php

LOL! Brilliant!

[lafinfil]

I'm having trouble picking one out http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&resnum=0&q=LOLcat%20fail&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

[swampy]

I can't help it if you guys don't know how to search the SCOTUS docket..

Here

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

No. 08-570
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed: October 31, 2008
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)
Rule 11

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008 Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.

[Dennis S]

What does this mean?

Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.

This legal mumbo-jumbo is all confusing.

[Gutenberg]

It apparently means we have another week to wait before the Supreme Court says "get lost" to Philip J. Berg and Alan Keyes. Big deal.

It's a loser, Swamp Thing. Fugeddaboutit.

[GGD]

Dennis S wrote:
What does this mean?

Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.

This legal mumbo-jumbo is all confusing.

I think it somehow gets interpreted to mean this, but I am not a lawyer.

swampy wrote:
Judge Souter, Supreme Court, has accepted, on appeal, the case filed in NJ and dismissed by that lower court. This tells me that at least one of the 'Supremes' recognizes there is standing for the case and the potential for a Constitutional crisis.

[swampy]

G... I'm sure you would like for it to go away. It wouldn't even be a question if Obama had provided more than a short form copy of his BC in the first place. The controversy has been around long enough that he could have stopped it at any time by doing so. Is he so arrogant to think that he doesn't have to prove his eligibility if it is questioned? Why is it so difficult for him? Why does he have 3 sets of lawyers fighting it?

It is a Constitutional matter and the people have not only a right but an obligation to seek the truth.

[NeverMind]

This is the PA guy, oh geesh. No credibility.