05-09-2023, 11:41 PM
Just one tank?
Putin must be running really low on tank
Putin must be running really low on tank
One (1) Tank?
|
05-09-2023, 11:41 PM
Just one tank?
Putin must be running really low on tank
05-10-2023, 12:14 AM
gadje wrote: One World War II-era T-34 tank. The other tanks all called in their apologies, had commitments elsewhere.
05-10-2023, 12:15 AM
I assume that means all the other T-34s are being refurbished for service in Ukraine?
05-10-2023, 12:21 AM
yes, Russia is low on just about everything.
05-10-2023, 12:23 AM
Smote wrote: Except nukes. They have lots of nukes and one very itchy trigger finger.
05-10-2023, 12:34 AM
yes, but that would trigger a world against Russia situation.
05-10-2023, 02:55 AM
Smote wrote: Do you think so? Yes, they would be more isolated than now. But do you think China wouldn't look the other way? I'm not so sure.
05-10-2023, 03:32 AM
Smote wrote: If Russia were to use all its nukes, or any number of them that triggered an escalation in the use of nuclear weapons between On the plus side, global warming won't be an issue anymore...
05-10-2023, 05:10 AM
Speedy wrote: Except nukes. They have lots of nukes and one very itchy trigger finger. Keep in mind there is a sneaking suspicion that the weapons in the Russian inventory may also have been victims of the kleptocracy. Tritium, for example, is valuable. And without it the fusion bombs fizzle.
05-10-2023, 08:21 AM
gabester wrote: If Russia were to use all its nukes, or any number of them that triggered an escalation in the use of nuclear weapons between On the plus side, global warming won't be an issue anymore... Exactly why a lot of people think that they won't use those if not pushed to the edge, there are nothing to gain from starting a nuclear warfare. They probably only going to use it when there is nothing left to lose |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|