Posts: 19,355
Threads: 1,726
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Starlink appealed the decision too. It doesn't really cost them anything, but they did spend money on the R&D, maintenance, and launches for the satellites. They need to recover some of those costs.
Posts: 52,153
Threads: 2,793
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
1
What they are trying to cover is outrageous CEO salaries
PG&E out this way has been raising rates, and will do so again "to recover costs from the fire".
True to a point, but administrative salaries won't be impacted.
I want to thing a state owned utility would better serve the customer, but then there's TX and windmills.
Posts: 33,855
Threads: 2,463
Joined: Apr 2025
Reputation:
0
Complicated. Years and years, ATT lost money on basic local telephone service but massive profits on long distance. Was their business model until they lost their monopoly status.
Seems to me, StarLink just doesn’t need to offer service at a loss. ATT today is NOT the same Ma Bell. But I’m sure they can make money at $15/month as Mint mobile offers that rate.
Posts: 68,291
Threads: 17,197
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
.....Death....becomes her......
Posts: 28,821
Threads: 209
Joined: May 2025
RAMd®d wrote:
What they are trying to cover is outrageous CEO salaries
PG&E out this way has been raising rates, and will do so again "to recover costs from the fire".
Which fire is that? My understanding is that all the recent fires in the L.A. area occurred in Edison territory.